|
In 1925 the London and Home Counties Joint Electricity Authority was formed to oversee the generation and supply of electricity in the capital. The use of electricity in domestic settings had started in the late 19th century, and grown in the first two decades of the 20th. Local power companies were formed and used small power stations to generate electricity for their local area. By 1910, 65 different private companies or local authorities supplied power in London, generated from around 70 small power stations. The new authority aimed to bring this all under one body. This new organisation was made up of 36 members, including the London Power Company, which brought another 10 power companies from west London, and the local authority companies, mainly from the east of the city. Although a number had existed before this amalgamation, from 1925 the use of the electricity showroom was expanded across the city, with one found in most high streets, and at other locations. These showrooms sought to promote the use of domestic appliances that used electricity, as well as electric lighting and heating. Early showrooms were fitted into existing shop parades, but as art deco and modernism began to make its mark on the British consciousness, these styles were employed to denote the futuristic application of domestic electricity. The most renowned architect of the electricity showroom was Maxwell Fry, who designed a number of showrooms in the mid 1930s. Whereas early buildings specifically built to promote and demonstrate the use of electricity, like the Strand Building in Clapton (1925, J.A. Bowden) or Electric House, Bow Road (1925, Harry Heckford), used Classical or Neo-Georgian dressings, Fry’s showrooms utilized lightweight steel, plate glass and vitrolite. His first showroom in Victoria Street featured a streamlined entrance in metal-faced plywood with a neon name sign and was decorated inside with photomurals by designer Hazen Sise. Fry then redesigned a shop for the Chelsea Electricity Supply company in Sloane Street in 1936, adding a neon sign and large windows to the exterior. Fry designed two more showrooms; the Mortimer Gall Electrical Centre in Cannon Street (1937) and the Regent Street showrooms for the Central London Electricity Company (1938). The Cannon Street showrooms were designed when Fry was still in partnership with Bauhaus founder Walter Gropius, during the German’s brief stay in England. Like the Sloane Street design, it fits new wine into an old bottle, adding a shopfront in curved glass, black vitrolite and glass brick to an existing building. In Regent Street, Fry designed premises with a spectacular interior featuring a spiral metal staircase and a photographic display by Laszlo Moholy-Nagy, which showed the story of electrical production and supply. Elsewhere in the city and its suburbs were a number of other showrooms using art deco and modernism to make the case for the electric age. In the north west suburb of Willesden, the local architects department designed and built Electric House (the name given to many electricity showrooms) in 1937. The three storey building occupied a prominent corner site and featured a rounded staircase tower and finished inside with travertine terrazzo, maple wood flooring and oblong light fittings, Unfortunately the building was demolished in 2014. A little further to the east is Hornsey Town Hall, opened in 1935 and designed by Reginald H. Uren. The town hall is flanked by two sets of showrooms, an electricity one by Uren (1938), and one for gas appliances by Dawe and Carter (1937). Both ranges were built in the same sober brick idiom as the civic buildings, but the gas showrooms feature curved windows and a series of stone reliefs by A.J. Ayres, who also contributed a brick relief to the electric side. The town hall and the two showrooms are all listed by Historic England. In nearby Wood Green are the showrooms and offices of the North Metropolitan Electric Power Supply Company, from 1930. In profile the building isn't as modernist as those in Willesden or Hornsey with its pitched roof, but it does have some lovely art deco detailing with underground style roundels across the exterior proclaiming ‘lighting’, ‘heating’, ‘cooking’ and ‘power’. In a similar mode are the former Gas Light and Coke showrooms in Edgware, designed by Welch, Cachemaille-Day and Lander in 1937. The showrooms were fitted into an existing Neo-Georgian parade, but the partnership added deco details such as chunky name signs, streamlined lighting and doors with half moon windows. Those moderne details are now gone, and the shop is now a Starbucks. The eastern suburbs largely had their electricity and gas supplied by municipal companies but they also built a large number of showrooms to promote the new power sources. In Leytonstone are the former Gas showrooms at 678 Leytonstone High Road, designed by esteemed architect George Grey Wornum, who fitted out the interior with relief lettering spelling out Gas Light & Coke, now long gone. The Neo-Georgian ground floor of the 1934 library around the corner was home to the electricity showrooms. Electricity offices for East Ham Borough were designed by N.F. Cachemaille-Day who added a frontage in black terrazzo and glass with bronze detailing, now demolished. One former showroom which still exists is that for Ilford, on the junction of the HIgh Road and Clark’s Road. Designed in 1931 by borough architect L.E.J. Reynolds, the building has a nice deco styled corner entrance and windows with metal reliefs on the first floor. Moving around the compass to the south, amidst the high rises of Croydon we find the Electricity showrooms and offices on Wellesley Road by Robert Atkinson, built between 1939-42. Like the Ilford building, it sits on a corner plot, although it is much larger and grander in scale, finished in Portland stone and featuring double height windows along the street level. Just along from this building are the moderne, former Segas Offices (1939-41), designed by William Newton for the Croydon Gas and Coke Company. Both buildings are listed, but the electricity office is in much better shape these days. Completing our journey in the south western reaches we find a pair of buildings featuring the work of architect J.E. Franck and artist Percy George Bentham. On York Street in Twickenham is the South Eastern Electricity Board Building, designed by Franck with stone relief by Bentham. The building again occupies a prominent corner site and is made more conspicuous by its art deco style clocktower, reminiscent of a bypass factory of the age. The work of the pair can also be found on a much smaller scale on Portsmouth Road in Kingston upon Thames (1935), where we find a substation, compact in size but still featuring the stylized light bulb and lightning bolts above the doorway by Bentham.
Electricity and gas showrooms continued to be a fixture of the high street after World War II, but the stylized deco details gave way to a more austere modernist palette. Soon even the later buildings disappeared, although some have (just about) survived such as former London Electricity Board showrooms and offices on Cambridge Heath Road (1959) by Watson & Coates. As you can see from this blog the novelty of domestic electricity may have faded but some pieces of the Electric Age still remain.
1 Comment
This week we have published our latest Mini Guide, dedicated to the work of architect Erno Goldfinger, who moved to Britain in 1934 and designed a series of buildings in his precise, austere style until his retirement in the late 1970s. Below is an extract from the guide, which you can purchase HERE. The buildings that have come to define Goldfinger as an architect are the two estates he finished his career with, the Brownfield in Poplar and the Cheltenham in North Kensington. The Rowlett Street Scheme as the Poplar project was originally known, had been planned by London County Council from 1963 as an extension of an earlier Poplar Borough estate, with Goldfinger designing the first phase incorporating the Balfron Tower, old people's maisonettes and a shop from February 1963. Like the Trellick tower in the west, Balfron has become an instantly recognizable trademark of Goldfingers design, with its separated service tower connected to the main block by access galleries arranged every three floors, reducing circulation space with no outdoor walkways. A series of thin slit windows run up the facade of the service tower, giving it the air of a defensive rampart. This attitude is reinforced by the rough, bush-hammered finish to the block, which despite its rough looking nature was actually carefully detailed by Goldfinger. The grey cement that comes to the surface when the concrete is setting was removed in the bush hammer process, revealing the colour and texture of the interior aggregate, and providing a more robust surface. The completed tower featured 136 flats plus 10 maisonettes, which were situated on the ground and first floors. The next phase from 1965 saw another block added, Carradale House, an eleven storey building arranged at a right angle to Balfron Tower. Like its sister tower it has a separate service section, but this time Goldfinger placed it between two blocks connected by covered walkways. Internally there is a combination of different sized flats, one bedroom and two bedrooms in size, with the larger ones having dual aspect. The third phase from 1967 saw the building of Glenkerry House, as well as low rise blocks along Burcham Street and a community centre. Glenkerry House is 14 storeys tall, containing 75 flats and four maisonettes, with the same three floors to one corridor, as the previous blocks on the scheme. The block forms a shortened U-plan, with a prominent projecting boiler house at the northern end. Once again aggregate and bush hammered concrete is used to form the building, with Goldfinger also using curved precast units for the balconies, and buff brick, to slightly broaden the platte established with the first two blocks. The estate was finally completed in 1975, with some planned additions, such as a car park, left unbuilt, but with other community facilities like a nursery, shop and playground included. Goldfinger and his wife moved into Flat 130 of the Balfron for two months after the tower was completed in February 1968, speaking to residents and making a number of revisions to improve the flats. The three towers were listed between 1996 and 2000, sparing them the demolition that would be visited on their near neighbour and contemporary, Robin Hood Gardens by Alison and Peter Smithson. In 2011, the housing association entrusted with the estate began the process of refurbishment, which required all residents to vacate whilst the work was undertaken. This caused a two-fold controversy; firstly the refurbishment replaced Goldfinger's original window design, double glazed with wooden frames and manufactured by Pilkingtons, for ones which were different in finish, colour and design. Secondly, the residents were decanted with no promise of being able to return to their flats, and eventually all of the flats were sold off on the private market, denuding the estate of its original purpose, something which Goldfinger strongly believed in
The mid 1930s saw the leafy streets of Ruislip become the centre of a clash between tradition and modernity, as Ruislip Northwood Urban District Council battled against a development by Walter Taylor Builders and the partnership of Connell Ward and Lucas. Walter Taylor had built three houses designed by the practice before they decided to team up and build a speculative project together. A piece of land for sale in Ruislip, belonging to Kings College Cambridge, (originally bequeathed to them by Henry VIII) was identified, and the architect met with the bursar of the college, who happened to the economist John Maynard Keynes, and a deal was agreed. This first parcel of land was large enough for six houses, with the idea that if they sold successfully more land would be purchased to extend the development. The architects Amyas Connell and Basil Ward, (Colin Lucas would join the partnership in 1934), produced a design straight out of the European modernist tradition, influenced by Le Corbusier and Walter Gropius. They initially planned to build three semi detached houses, which would be arranged in C-plans, with the projecting parts to include the garage and entrance, with the living space centered along a three storey range. The houses would be constructed of reinforced concrete and finished in white render, emphasizing the stark right angles of its design. The end of the ranges would contain a glazed staircase, a feature that would project openness and cleanliness, a central tenet of the modernist project. Plans were submitted to the authorities in September 1933, and the scheme was turned down, with the council citing the breaking of various byelaws, statues and regulations. The case was referred to a local advisory panel of the Royal Institute of British Architects, which upheld the council's decision, mentioning in their report the use of concrete, which they considered “cold, noisy..” and the extensive use of glass in the staircase sections. The builders decided to appeal both of these decisions and the case went to arbitration. Various witnesses were called, with the scheme getting support from Kings College and architecture critic P. Morton Shand. One of the members of the RIBA panel expanded on their opinion stating that the extensive glass used could cause the public to see the occupiers in their pajamas! Of course Amyas Connell was no stranger to this kind of conflict between the planning authorities and those looking to build modernist homes. He had designed High and Over in Amersham for Prof. Bernard Ashmole in 1929, which the local council had only passed the design with “the greatest reluctance", having been unable to find a legal reason to turn it down. The Ruislip appeal was granted, with the council directed to give the architects a list of alterations to consider. These changes included reducing the amount of glazing and adding decorative elements to soften the hard modernist edge, making it more like the other speculative moderne houses found in the area, such as this along Norwich Road and Northwood Way. The architects did reduce the amount of glazing, but did not add any other elements and their new designs were passed in August 1934. Construction began shortly afterwards on the first semi detached pair and another set of plans were submitted in September for another pair. However due to the various delays, the clamour in the housing market for modernist designs had cooled, with hundreds of speculative Sun Trap houses having been built in the meantime around suburban London. This design, pioneered by the altogether more pragmatic firm of Welch, Cachemaille-Day and Lander, mixed traditional and modern elements to create a more palatable form of modernity for the British house buyer. This lack of interest meant the projected Parkwood Estate, petered out with just three houses built, with the second semi detached pair abandoned with only one house completed. The builders, Walter Taylor, had prepared a brochure to sell the anticipated development, with heavy emphasis on its modern features. It mentioned the "maximum light and air” that the houses would admit, and that their concrete construction would offer “warm, quiet, damp -free rooms”, a rejoinder to the council's opinion on the material. The brochure also called the area's existing housing stock, largely built up over the past 30 years, “imitative, conventional, bad copies of bygone styles..” Despite this rousing call to modernity, the shock of the new was obviously too shocking and Kings College ended buying back some of the land it had sold the builders for the development. Connell, Ward and Lucas continued designing houses until the outbreak of World War II, with another prominent planning dispute of the building of a house for Geoffrey Walford at Frognal in Hampstead, which Reginald Blomfield, called "one of the greatest acts of vandalism ever perpetrated in London". The house was eventually built in 1938, but Walford only lived there for a couple of years. The partnership broke up after the outbreak of World War II, and went their separate ways.The ensuing 90 years has seen the Ruislip houses taken somewhat into the heart of the local population, with them nicknamed variously “the glass houses”, “Casa Blanca” and even “Blue Peter”, (due to their previously blue painted window frames). The houses did sustain some damage during World War II from a nearby bomb hit, but were repaired. In 1989 they were awarded listed status by English Heritage, and well cared for by their current inhabitants, true examples of modernism in metro-land.
Anatomy of a House No.23 |
Archives
April 2026
Categories |
RSS Feed